As the People of Ireland prepare for their very own Irish Referendum on the EU I believe that any right thinking man or woman would be voting a resounding NO!
A singularity in the final phase of the collapse of the Rothschild’s global fascist financial monetary system is on the lips of everyone in Europe today. Ireland is being told they must completely forgo their sovereignty for the better good of the Inter Alpha Groups banks. Some patriots in Ireland beg to differ.
I, for one, cannot wait to see the Euro and then the EU collapse, this scab on the skin of society, this parasite has to die and die soon.
If you want to see exactly what is at stake and who is behind it then watch the short clip below.
What would happen if all of the traffic lights were turned off and people had to take personal responsibility for their own driving actions? Would they drive more safely? Would they allow other motorists right of way? Would they have empathy for their fellow drivers and pedestrians?
Watch the clip below and you might just be surprised what happens when there are no traffic lights!
I think that you will agree that the nanny state does not have to nanny people at all, people can be responsible for their own actions when the control of the state is removed.
ITV is a television company in the UK that ran a program called “Exposure”, exposing how Certificated Bailiffs in the UK actually operate. They show the lengths that many Bailiffs will go to including, racist threats and intimidation. Bailiffs are nice people!
Now, you have to realise that a Court has to Certificate the Bailiffs and that they must post a bond that should ensure that they act with empathy and within the guidlines as well as the statutes for collecting Council Tax.
If you have ever had the unfortunate experience of having Certificated Bailiffs attend your property to recover any so called debt then you will soon have realised that they are far from “nice people”!
The area of collecting debts by Bailiffs, levying distress, entering your home and walking posession orders is well documented, however Bailiffs will never tell you what your rights are.
YOU MUST KNOW WHAT YOUR OWN RIGHTS ARE.
There are simple rules to follow from your own point of view and I will provide links to some great resources after this short series of video clips. Enjoy!
What if it was illegal to do something that would save your life or the life of a much loved family member or friend?
What if you were a Police Constable and knew something was being done that was illegal but could cure somebody from a very serious disease, lets say ‘Cancer‘, would you arrest them and charge them for trying to help save the life of their family member or friend?
What if you were a Police Constable but the person who could be cured was a member of ‘Your’ family or a friend , would ‘You’ go against legislation, break the (law) legislation, to save this persons life?
What if you were a Judge, lawyer or clerk of the court, would you prosecute and sentence people for trying to save the lives of their loved one’s in using this cure?
What if you were a Judge, lawyer or clerk of the court, and the person who was being prosecuted for trying to save the life of their loved one was You?
What if this thing was a plant that anybody on the planet could grow, and should rightly be allowed to grow, but because of lobby groups a ’Bill’ was ‘Forced’ through the Houses of Parliament in order to make it “Illegal”?
What if Big Pharma used lobby groups to lobby Parliament in order to make this “Plant Cure” illegal so they could sell Millions of units of their product over decades, generating Billions of pounds in revenue and causing untold deaths, would that ’PISS YOU OFF’ enough to want to change things?
What if the products and services provided by “Giant Pharmaceutical” companies or “Big Pharma” were no longer required because they could be replaced by this plant that costs £1 to buy and pence to grow, would you start curing yourselves?
What if a Doctor who performed autopsies on Cancer patients told you “NOT ONE” of the people he performed autopsies on died from Cancer but instead died from the effects of Cancer, being the radiation and chemotherapy used to ’Treat’ it, would that make you sit up and take notice?
What if this cure has been ‘Not so’ common knowledge for decades because it had been suppressed from you in the guise of ‘Protecting the People’ from ’Madmen’ that use this plant who then go on to use other substances like Heroin.
What if all this is true, what about all the different cancer research companies who have benefited from your Love and Generosity over the decades actually knew about this, or if they didn’t, how come “I” know about all this and now you do, whilst not earning millions of pounds in donations a year but they DON’T?
What if Rick Simpson contacted the Canadian Cancer Society about this Plant curing Cancer and they responded by saying “The Society does not endorse or support medical products or dietary supplements…. Thanks for the information. We wish you luck in your work”?
What if this plant has been hailed as evil and destructive and kills people when in fact the exact polar opposite is true, that it takes us to a higher ‘Consciousness’ is ‘Good’ for us and in fact “Heals” not just Cancer, but a whole host of diseases.
What if worldwide Cancer experts agreed that chemotherapy is largely ineffective in destroying most Cancers but instead kills MOSTLY healthy cells?
What if studies showed that patients that accept chemotherapy/radiation are more likely to die SOONER than if they had received no treatment at all?
What if the only side effects of ingesting this plant were HEALTH and HAPPINESS?
What if it stated in the Lancet Medical Journal that it is a FACT that “Chemotherapy kills more people than it saves” and what if others who have survived cancer due to them using medical cannabis as a cure had survived this disease?
What if you were an Uncle to a beautiful and loving 20 year old niece who died due to pregnancy induced diabetes who left a beautiful baby girl behind, but since found out this plant could have saved her life?
The endocannabinoid system in our bodies regulate our cancer defence — so it makes sense that cannabis works effectively in this area, and the science backs that up.
For those who dispute the fact that cannabis can cure cancer, I would like to refer you to numerous studies (since 1974!) that show that cannabinoids kills cancer cells, shrink tumours, halts the spread of invasive carcinomas, and prevents occurrence. I don’t know if you have the energy or the interest to follow up these links, but if you do value truth over hearsay and propaganda, then I would suggest you look at them. First you have to ask yourself: why don’t you know about this? (Then you should get really, really angry).
I took my pensioner mum, my wife and young family shopping today. “Well that’s nothing to rant about”, I hear you scream!
I wish that you lot would stop being so impatient and interrupting my every thinking thought as I type with both thumbs.
Anyway, I digress, we went to a market and did a bit of shopping and as per usual I was bored stiff and just wanting to go home, I am a typical male, I detest all forms of shopping. Once we had finished in the market they decided to move on to the main shopping area and our youngest was screaming by this point as we had left her dummy tit in the car. I decided to walk back to the car and drive it to a parking area closer to the main shopping area and retrieve the silencer!
I was reversing into a parking space when I clocked one of “our finest black clad guys”, walking behind the car. I parked safely and proceeded to walk briskly to the entrance of the shopping mall. As I passed plod he barked, “are you in a hurry or something,” I said, “yeah, I am.” and continued on past him. He then again barked, “WHAT’S THE EMERGENCY,” I simply held up the dummy tit and replied with a smile “dummy tit emergency, CYA”!
Now I don’t know about you but I don’t know of any law or statute that prescribes a maximum walking speed for any of us, I also don’t know of any that state that it is illegal to overtake a copper whilst on foot! If any of you know of any then I am all ears.
Council tax, pah, I would be better giving all my earnings to a charity!
I am not an idle waster, I actually work for myself.
I am not unemployable, I choose not to be employed and as such I employ myself. I work 10-14 hours per day without the guarantee of a salary. I get out of my business what myself and others contribute, if the business is not a success then quite a few people will not have a wage neither.
I do not class myself as a Freeman nor a Sovereign, I do not need labels at all as I am just me! I am, however, interested in the way that Freemen and Sovereigns operate. I like their attitude and I know quite a few in real life and they are not benefit scroungers, neither am I.
Others have said and attempted to tarnish me with so many stereotypes used that it honestly beggars belief:
Benefits scounger
Council estate chav
Idle wasters
Freeloader
Those are just a few of the sterotypical slurs levied when someone makes a stand against something that they believe to be to be immoral. I am none of the above, I pay my own way and I rely not on the Government nor any other man to supply me with any benefits.
I firmly believe that council tax is immoral because it is not there as funding for services and this has been openly admitted by various councils. It is there to top up the shortfall in the general fund/grant issued by central government. Via Freedom Of Information requests it has also been proven that as much as 50% of council tax actually goes to pay into the pension schemes of local govt employees. Why should I have to subsidise anyone elses pension? Nobody subsidises mine!
I have never refused to pay council tax, I have used many avenues to attempt to get local councils to exactly define why I should have to pay it, what I am paying for, how the amount is calculated, what the breakdown for each service is, how much from the general fund compared to the amount collected in council tax is allocated for services such as Police, Fire etc.
How much from council tax has been investested overseas, such as in Iceland, how much was lost due to the collapse of banks and the crucial one is, why was there a surplus left over to invest if council tax is there to pay for services! Am I not entitled to know the answers to these questions? Or would you suggest that I just bend over and accept it all?
I have never attended a court over council tax, I have had a liability order issued against me and Bailiffs attended on numerous occassions to attempt to levy distress. They did not succeed in gaining a walking posession order let alone levying distress.
I do not use a “system” as no system is bullet proof. I have now dealt with council tax in the Scottish and also the English legal jurisdictions and not once have they managed to commence full proceedings against me.
Whilst in England a council did send the Bailiffs and yes they can be very threatening, however studying the statutes regarding council tax, role of Bailiffs, and the enforcability was invaluable to myself. The Bailiffs ended up handing the case file back to the council as they could enforce jack shit as they were denied entry.
I then did an FOIA request to the council asking the following:
How many households were in arrears for council tax
How many liability orders had been granted
How many times Bailiffs had been instructed
How many times walking posessions orders had been gained
Total value of all goods via walking posession orders
Number of times goods had been removed
Total value of goods sold at auction
Once I received the information I sat with my chin on the floor!
How many households were in arrears for council tax 4,709
How many liability orders had been granted 2,721
How many times Bailiffs had been instructed 1,822
How many times walking posessions orders had been gained 1.082
Total value of all goods via walking posession orders not available
Number of times goods had been removed zero
Total value of goods sold at auction zero
I then arranged a meeting with the Financial Director of said council and I brought all of this up, I had the local Tory councillor in tow (who was as much use as tits on a fish) and stated that the council was using intimidation and threats against householders. The FD had to agree this as he said “we have no other way of collecting this tax”! I stated that I was going to go to the media with the figures and FOIA and he asked me not to do this as “something could be sorted out”.
Two days later I received a council tax statement showing that £0.00 was owed!
So, I am not a freeman nor a sovereign, I just might be an awkward sod that firmly believes that he has the right to know.
The crux of this is that Councils are openly using threats and intimidation to extort monies from ordinary people.
Why don’t you just say no for a change and stop being a scared wee lamb, you will be lead to slaughter you know!
****Announcement***** Bonded car insurance is on its way and will only be sold through Tickelo if you havent joined Tickelo now is the time to join up insurance based on every member paying a bond of £500 but £1000 for under 21/inexperienced * TBC and a policy price of approximately £180 per year and a commission fee of £36 to offset pay and costs for staff reduced to £18 in yr 2 etc , subject to increase /decrease , if you have an accident you lose your bond and have to bond for £1000 reduced back to £500 after 1 yr premium increase x2 after accident
Once you sign up to Tickelo you will be put into a special member group , and will have access to a member only area , as its created to keep you updated
The insurance will not go live until 1000 members have shown an interest , so if your insurance is currently higher than the rate shown above sign up now , tell your friends too if they pay more than this , and also tell any young family members or friends , young people currently pay in excess of up to £4000+ for a policy
Finally – Currently the scheme is only open to UK drivers , other areas will update as we get more info.
Once you have joined Tickelo, please add Albion Insurance as a friend and allow 36 hrs for the friend request to be accepted.
Ministers of the Crown have, from time to time entered into treaties on behalf of the UK. It should be noted that the Ministers concerned must seek authority from the Crown by the Royal Prerogative before signing. Because the Monarch is constitutionally bound to respect the provisions of the common law, which were recognised in Magna Carta and declared in the Bill of Rights, such Royal Prerogative has the following restrictions. (The term “prerogative” means a right or privilege exclusive to an individual or class).
(a) Prerogative cannot be used in an innovatory way. If this were not so, the executive could dispense with Parliament and Judiciary and become an unlimited tyranny. Any future Attorney General could claim that an edict was part of a treaty and it would become unquestionable.
(b) The use of Prerogative power may not be subversive of the rights and liberties of the subject. (The case of Nichols v. Nichols stated “Prerogative is created for the benefit of the people and cannot be exercised to their prejudice”.)
Royal Prerogative may not be used to suspend or offend against Statutes in Force. This comes from the Bill of Rights and the Coronation Oath Act which specifies the following form of words; “Archbishop: Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the peoples of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland . . . according to their respective laws and usages.” Prospective Monarch: “I solemnly promise so to do.” Note the similarity to the Judicial Oath. This is because the Courts dispense justice on behalf of the Crown.
The Limitations of Royal Prerogative are clear:
“No prerogative may be recognised that is contrary to Magna Carta or any other statute, or that interferes with the liberties of the subject. The courts have jurisdiction therefore, to enquire into the existence of any prerogative, it being a maxim of the common law that the King ought to be under no man, but under God and the law, because the law makes the King. If any prerogative is disputed, the Courts must decide the question of whether or not it exists in the same way as they decide any other question of law. If a prerogative is clearly established, they must take the same judicial notice of it as they take of any other rule of law.”
Bowles v Bank of England (1913) confirmed that, “the Bill of Rights still remains unrepealed, and practice of custom, however prolonged, or however acquiesced in on the part of the subject can not be relied on by the Crown as justifying any infringement of its provisions”.
The Bill of Rights 1688 is a declaration of the common law. It is also an operative Statute. It contains the Oath of Allegiance, which is required by Magna Carta to be taken by all Crown servants including members of the Armed Forces, MP’s, and the Judiciary. They are required not to “take into consequence or example anything to the detriment of the subjects liberties”.
The Oath required of Crown servants includes “I will be faithful and bear true Allegiance . . . “The qualification “true” confirms that allegiance is not required to a Monarch whose actions are unlawful.
It can be shown that we have recently had a coup-d’etat in this country. This was accomplished when the Government took control over the armed forces to use them for political purposes.
The Bill of Rights allows the Crown a standing army in peace time and who’s members swear allegiance to defend Her “in person Crown and dignity against all enemies”. No one else (except the Duke of Argyll), is allowed an army.
The Armed Forces Act 1996 purports to allow the Crown to set aside the requirement for annual army acts. It states that the Crown may authorise the armed forces by “Order in Council”. This provision would permit the Government to use the Armed Forces even if Parliament was suspended, and is contrary to the intent of the Bill of Rights.
Various defence reviews have resulted in the Government issuing mission statements that claims that the forces role in future is to defend the Realm and “to implement Government policy, in particular foreign policy”. This is from documents published by the MOD and available from them and on the Web. It means that the Government is now claiming that it can use the Army for its own purposes where the safety of the Realm is not threatened. Serving members of the Forces have been invited to sign new contracts agreeing to this new arrangement. Recent recruiting adverts for the Forces reflect this. A recent cinema advert for the RAF depicts a foreign “peace keeping” operation and has the slogan “Their country needs you”.
This is a equivalent to a coup.
13 August 2005
Copyright UK Parliament. Article credit to House Of Lords
The European Union is probably the biggest unelected organisation ever to have ruled any sovereign country. The EU is very well adapted in usurping any country’s sovereign status. They in the EU are the politburo of politics as they care not about the masses. You know, the normal and everday kind of people like you and me?
Our Politicians on a national level and more so on a local level can do nothing, rien, zilch, zero to stop this onslaught of more and more rules, legislation, statutes, regulations and edicts issued by this unelected shower of unelected bastards. They are bastards as they have no father who has claimed them.
But, we could look at the history to see where they actually came from. Could it be China and Mao? I think not. Could it be National Socialism which led to the rise of Mr Hitler? Possibly! Could it be the Eastern block and the Soviets? Well it could be a combination of all of the above but this would then mean that there is no democracy in the EU!
Our own rights to decide what our needs are, who we contract with on a local and national level have been removed by the EU Parliament, so they say! The EU Parliament is nothing more than a non-entity that does not and cannot change EU policy. See the link yet? Policy and Politburo?
Unless the people of the United Kingdom actually wake up and say no then nothing will change.
This great country of ours does indeed have a Bill of Rights Act for both Scotland and England, Both are dated in the year 1689. Long time ago, I know, but those acts are still on the statute books.
It is not that I need anyone to tell me or allow me any rights, I know what my rights are and they do not have to be written down. However, these statutes actually state what our rights are in law, who am I to argue? The major issue is that the EU has basically said, “we don’t care”! Well EU, I do fucking care!
